Your Ad Here

December 29, 2007

Ohio’s Alternative to Diebold Machines May Be Equally Bad

phorest writes "One would have thought the choice of Ohio lawmakers to move away from Diebold touch-screen voting terminals would be welcomed by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). Instead, the group is warning the elections board that their alternative might be illegal under state laws. 'The main dispute is whether a central optical scan of ballots at the board's headquarters downtown would result in votes not being counted on ballots that are incorrectly filled out. The ACLU believes the intent of election law is to ensure voters can be notified immediately of a voting error and be able to make a second-chance vote.'"

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Leave a Reply

Helpful Links:

Internal Links:

categories:

search blog:

other:

Blogroll

archives:

December 2007
M T W T F S S
« Nov   Jan »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  

Recent Posts:

Stay Up-To-Date With Posts

eXTReMe Tracker

33 queries. 0.674 seconds